Gideon Obarzanek’s Digital Moves

Gideon Obarzanek’s Digital Moves from PopTech on Vimeo.

árvores

Classic Television Commercials 1948

all and more in the Internet Archive

Stand up for research

Statement

The latest proposal by the higher education funding councils is for 25% of the new Research Excellence Framework (REF) to be assessed according to 'economic and social impact'. As academics, researchers and higher education professionals we believe that it is counterproductive to make funding for the best research conditional on its perceived economic and social benefits.

The REF proposals are founded on a lack of understanding of how knowledge advances. It is often difficult to predict which research will create the greatest practical impact. History shows us that in many instances it is curiosity-driven research that has led to major scientific and cultural advances.

If implemented, these proposals risk undermining support for basic research across all disciplines and may well lead to an academic brain drain to countries such as the United States that continue to value fundamental research.

Universities must continue to be spaces in which the spirit of adventure thrives and where researchers enjoy academic freedom to push back the boundaries of knowledge in their disciplines.

We, therefore, call on the UK funding councils to withdraw the current REF proposals and to work with academics and researchers on creating a funding regime which supports and fosters basic research in our universities and colleges rather than discourages it.

Discoveries that would not survive the REF (.pdf) [213kb]

Emancipação

Porque vale a pena: sem nada

A testosterona reduz a generosidade

The Chronicle of Philanthropy
3 Dezembro

Hormone Inhibits Giving in Men, Study Finds

Scientists have found that giving to others triggers a warm glow, similar to the endorphin-induced highs that people have after sex, a good meal, or indulging in opiates. Now a new study finds another link between sex and charity — or, rather, the lack of charity.

The researchers, two California economists, studied the effects of the sex hormone testosterone on the generosity of male university students. Higher levels of testosterone, they found, made the students both more reluctant to give to others and more demanding that others give to them...

Belissimo artista

Installations, videos and projects in public space
by Oliver Ressler

belissima ideia

e as outras também do prémio The Fun Theory

the paradox of choice

economics is a social science after all

The Financial Crisis: How Economists Went Astray

Two Nobel Laureates and over 2000 Signatories Uphold that Economists have Mistaken Mathematical Beauty for Economic Truth


On 2nd September 2009, Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman wrote in the New York Times that in the run-up to the 2008 financial crash “the economics profession went astray because economists, as a group, mistook beauty, clad in impressive-looking mathematics, for truth.”

An online declaration in support of a fuller extract from Krugman’s article (see the text below) has received over 2000 signatures in little over a month. This is already higher than all earlier appeals for the reform of economics, since and including the June 2000 petition by students at the École Normale Supérieure (France's premier institution of higher learning) protesting against the excessive mathematical formalisation of their curriculum and its neglect of economic realities. This petition received 1545 signatures and prompted the French Minister of Education to set up formal enquiry.

Krugman joins a line of Nobel Laureates, including Ronald Coase, Wassily Leontief and Milton Friedman, who have argued that economists has become largely transformed into a branch of applied mathematics, with inadequate contact with the real world. On the online website, Krugman’s words are supported by Nobel Laureate Douglass North.

The narrow training of economists – which concentrates on mathematical techniques and the building of empirically uncontrolled formal models – has been a major reason for the failure of the economics profession to appreciate market vulnerability and warn of the serious risks in the financial system. In their pursuit of tractable models, economists have made over-simplified and misguided assumptions concerning of human agents, markets and other institutions, rather than engaging adequately with the complexities of the real world.

Mathematics is very important and useful, but it should be a servant to economics, and not its master. Real-world substance should prevail over mathematical technique. To help avoid further failings, governments in the USA, Europe and elsewhere should look into the state of economics and the way economics is taught.

Of the 2000-plus signatories of the current online appeal, 62% have PhDs, 20% are from the USA, and 10% from the UK.

As well as Nobel Laureate Douglass North, other prominent signatories include leading international academics and researchers such as Masahiko Aoki, Tony Aspromourgos, Michael Bernstein, Margaret Blair, Mark Blaug, Daniel Bromley, John Cantwell, Ha-Joon Chang, Victoria Chick, Keith Cowling, Kurt Dopfer, Gregory Dow, Ronald Dore, Giovani Dosi, Jean-Pierre Dupuy, Peter Earl, Jan Fagerberg, Olivier Favereau, Duncan Foley, John Foster, Geoffrey Harcourt, Arnold Heertje, Joseph Henrich, Stuart Holland, Will Hutton, Peter Kellner, Arjo Klamer, Mark Lavoie, Richard Lipsey, Brian Loasby, Mark Lutz, Ronald Martin, William McKelvey, Deirdre McCloskey, Stanley Metcalfe, Julie Nelson, Richard Norgaard, Luigi Pasinetti, Peter Richerson, Erik Reinert, Barkley Rosser, Kurt Rothschild, Bridget Rosewell, Robert Rowthorn, Malcolm Rutherford, Paolo Saviotti, Malcolm Sawyer, Esther-Mirjam Sent, Mark Setterfield, Gerald Silverberg, Laurence Shute, Robert Skidelsky, Peter Skott, Ronald Stanfield, Arthur Stinchcombe, Thomas Weisskopf, Sidney Winter and Stefano Zamagni.

All 2000-plus signatories endorse the following words by Paul Krugman:

"Few economists saw our current crisis coming, but this predictive failure was the least of the field’s problems. More important was the profession’s blindness to the very possibility of catastrophic failures in a market economy ... the economics profession went astray because economists, as a group, mistook beauty, clad in impressive-looking mathematics, for truth ... economists fell back in love with the old, idealized vision of an economy in which rational individuals interact in perfect markets, this time gussied up with fancy equations ... Unfortunately, this romanticized and sanitized vision of the economy led most economists to ignore all the things that can go wrong. They turned a blind eye to the limitations of human rationality that often lead to bubbles and busts; to the problems of institutions that run amok; to the imperfections of markets – especially financial markets – that can cause the economy’s operating system to undergo sudden, unpredictable crashes; and to the dangers created when regulators don’t believe in regulation. ... When it comes to the all-too-human problem of recessions and depressions, economists need to abandon the neat but wrong solution of assuming that everyone is rational and markets work perfectly." (New York Times, September 2nd, 2009.)

Additional supporters can sign the petition on
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/revitalizing_economics?e

(If you do not wish to make a contribution, then exist immediately when the web page changes.)

Ken Robinson

Canção

Porque é que o pão cai sempre com a manteiga para baixo

escapou-se-me

Cáritas vai dar vales de refeição a quem enfrenta "pobreza envergonhada"
06.10.2009 - 07h17 António Marujo, Público
A Cáritas Portuguesa irá iniciar a distribuição de vales de refeição com o objectivo de combater o fenómeno da pobreza envergonhada. Através de um protocolo que será assinado, no próximo dia 14, com a Ticket Restaurant, a Cáritas irá facultar talões de refeição com valores de cinco, dez ou 15 euros, para pessoas que vivem situações de privação e que nem sequer conseguem pedir ajuda a instituições de solidariedade.

Portanto, para evitar a humilhação dos novos pobres as pessoas vão ao supermercado comprar produtos com tickets, como todos nós aliás!!! E para que seja tudo bem discreto, toca a publicitar a notícia nas primeiras páginas dos jornais e telejornais.
Que vergonha que eu tenho de um país que deixa que isto aconteça!!!

Play, Samuel Beckett

Directed by Anthony Minghella

Beckett's text

Militant Research

Militant research is a concept-tool that works on the premise that all interpretation of the world is linked to some kind of action. Related to practices of co-research and institutional analysis, militant research proposes that all new knowledge production affects and modifies the bodies and subjectivities of those who have participated. Rather than use research as a tool to categorise and separate knowledge from practice, militant research operates transversally, becoming part of the process that organises relationships between bodies, knowledge, social practices and fields of action.

Marta Malo de Molina:
Common notions, part 1: workers-inquiry, co-research, consciousness-raising
Common Notions, Part 2: Institutional Analysis, Participatory Action-Research, Militant Research

Stéphanie, 11 de Setembro, 23ª

Paris Match

Michel D., 13 de Julho

Merci de diffuser
cette lettre à mes collègues de travail
et aux délégués du personnel

Je me suicide à cause de mon travail à France Télécom. C’est la seule cause. Urgence permanente, surcharge de travail, absence de formation, désorganisation totale de l’entreprise. Management par la terreur !

Cela m’a totalement désorganisé et perturbé. Je suis devenu une épave, il vaut mieux en finir. (...) J’insiste là-dessus, c’est bien le travail qui a provoqué ça et donc c’est France Télécom qui est responsable de mon suicide.

Michel D.*

PS : Je sais que beaucoup de personnes vont dire qu’il y a d’autres causes que le travail (je suis seul, non marié, sans enfant, etc.). Certains sous-entendent aussi que je n’acceptais pas de vieillir. Mais non, avec tout ça je me suis toujours bien débrouillé. C’est bien le travail l’unique cause.

La Provence

canal

Waterways Code

Margarita com chili e gengibre

1 1/2 oz chili tequila
1/2 oz triple sec
1 oz lime or lemon juice
slice of ginger

Rub glass rim with citrus juice and then dip in fine granulated salt.

Place all ingredients in a cocktail shaker filled with ice. Shake 30 seconds and pour into glasses.

failure

All of old. Nothing else ever. Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better.

Samuel Becket, Worstward Ho

Kafka's good

Reading Kafka 'enhances cognitive mechanisms', claims study
Alison Flood
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 17 September 2009

Subjects who had just read Kafka's The Country Doctor were better at recognising patterns in grammar test, psychologists found

Forget Sudokus and crosswords: if you want to sharpen up your thinking, immerse yourself in Kafka's stories of the surreal.
Research from psychologists at the University of California in Santa Barbara and the University of British Columbia claims to show that exposure to surrealism enhances the cognitive mechanisms which oversee implicit learning functions. The psychologists showed a group of subjects Kafka's story The Country Doctor, a disturbing and surreal tale in which a doctor travels by "unearthly horses" to an ill patient, only to climb into bed naked with him and then escape through the window "naked, exposed to the frost of this most unhappy of ages"...

Crise

Britishness

Skye

Right Where it Belongs, NIN

See the animal in it's cage that you built
Are you sure what side you're on?
Better not look him too closely in the eye
Are you sure what side of the glass you are on?
See the safety of the life you have built
Everything where it belongs
Feel the hollowness inside of your heart
And it's all
Right where it belongs

What if everything around you
Isn't quite as it seems?
What if all the world you think you know
Is an elaborate dream?
And if you look at your reflection
Is it all you wanted to be?
What if you could look right through the cracks?
Would you find yourself
Find yourself afraid to see?

What if all the world's inside of your head
Just creations of your own?
Your devils and your gods
All the living and the dead
And you really are alone
You can live in this illusion
You can choose to believe
You keep looking but you can't find the woods
While you're hiding in the trees

What if everything around you
Isn't quite as it seems?
What if all the world you used to know
Is an elaborate dream?
And if you look at your reflection
Is it all you wanted to be?
What if you could look right through the cracks
Would you find yourself
Find yourself afraid to see?

Subtitles

A Mula da Cooperativa, Max, 1959

Portugal foi assim.

oui, luv

Tory controlled borough of Barnet adopts budget airline model

in The Guardian
by Robert Booth
27/08/09

A leading Conservative council is using the business model of budget airlines, Ryanair and easyJet, to inspire a radical reform of public service provision which is being seen as a blueprint for Tory government.

The practices of the no-frills airlines, who charge customers extra for services which were once considered part of the standard fare, are being emulated by the London borough of Barnet as it embarks on "a relentless drive for efficiency". A spokesman for the council has unofficially dubbed the project "easyCouncil".

Barnet wants householders to pay extra to jump the queue for planning consents, in the way budget airlines charge extra for priority boarding. And as budget airline passengers choose to spend their budget on either flying at peaktime or having an in-flight meal, recipients of adult social care in Barnet will choose to spend a limited budget on whether to have a cleaner or a respite carer or even a holiday to Eastbourne. Other examples of proposed reforms include reducing the size of waste bins to minimise the cost of council rubbish collections...

A letter from a victim of jounal reviewers

Journal of Systems and Software, Volume 54, Issue 1, 30 September 2000, Page 1.

*Editor’s Note:* It seems appropriate, in this issue of JSS containing the findings of our annual Top Scholars/Institutions study, to pay tribute to the persistent authors who make a journal like this, and a study like that, possible. In their honor, we dedicate the following humorous, anonymously-authored, letter!

Dear Sir, Madame, or Other:

Enclosed is our latest version of Ms. #1996-02-22-RRRRR, that is the re-re-re-revised revision of our paper. Choke on it. We have again rewritten the entire manuscript from start to finish. We even changed the g-d-running head! Hopefully, we have suffered enough now to satisfy even you and the bloodthirsty reviewers.

I shall skip the usual point-by-point description of every single change we made in response to the critiques. After all, it is fairly clear that your anonymous reviewers are less interested in the details of scientific procedure than in working out their personality problems and sexual frustrations by seeking some kind of demented glee in the sadistic and arbitrary exercise of tyrannical power over hapless authors like ourselves who happen to fall into their clutches. We do understand that, in view of the misanthropic psychopaths you have on your editorial board, you need to keep sending them papers, for if they were not reviewing manuscripts they would probably be out mugging little old ladies or clubbing baby seals to death. Still, from this batch of reviewers, C was clearly the most hostile, and we request that you not ask him to review this revision. Indeed, we have mailed letter bombs to four or five people we suspected of being reviewer C, so if you send the manuscript back to them, the review process could be unduly delayed.

Some of the reviewers’ comments we could not do anything about. For example, if (as C suggested) several of my recent ancestors were indeed drawn from other species, it is too late to change that. Other suggestions were implemented, however, and the paper has been improved and benefited. Plus, you suggested that we shorten the manuscript by five pages, and we were able to accomplish this very effectively by altering the margins and printing the paper in a different font with a smaller typeface. We agree with you that the paper is much better this way.

One perplexing problem was dealing with suggestions 13–28 by reviewer B. As you may recall (that is, if you even bother reading the reviews before sending your decision letter), that reviewer listed 16 works that he/she felt we should cite in this paper. These were on a variety of different topics, none of which had any relevance to our work that we could see. Indeed, one was an essay on the Spanish–American war from a high school literary magazine. The only common thread was that all 16 were by the same author, presumably someone whom reviewer B greatly admires and feels should be more widely cited. To handle this, we have modified the Introduction and added, after the review of the relevant literature, a subsection entitled “Review of Irrelevant Literature” that discusses these articles and also duly addresses some of the more asinine suggestions from other reviewers.

We hope you will be pleased with this revision and will finally recognize how urgently deserving of publication this work is. If not, then you are an unscrupulous, depraved monster with no shred of human decency. You ought to be in a cage. May whatever heritage you come from be the butt of the next round of ethnic jokes. If you do accept it, however, we wish to thank you for your patience and wisdom throughout this process, and to express our appreciation for your scholarly insights. To repay you, we would be happy to review some manuscripts for you; please send us the next manuscript that any of these reviewers submits to this journal.

Assuming you accept this paper, we would also like to add a footnote acknowledging your help with this manuscript and to point out that we liked the paper much better the way we originally submitted it, but you held the editorial shotgun to our heads and forced us to chop, reshuffle, hedge, expand, shorten, and in general convert a meaty paper into stir-fried vegetables. We could not – or would not – have done it without your input.

Shame IKEA

...In 2004, the last year that the INGKA Holding group filed accounts, the company reported profits of €1.4 billion on sales of €12.8 billion, a margin of nearly 11 percent. Because INGKA Holding is owned by the nonprofit INGKA Foundation, none of this profit is taxed. The foundation's nonprofit status also means that the Kamprad family cannot reap these profits directly, but the Kamprads do collect a portion of IKEA sales profits through the franchising relationship between INGKA Holding and Inter IKEA Systems.

Inter IKEA Systems collected €631 million of franchise fees in 2004, but reported pre-tax profits of only €225 million in 2004. One of the major pre-tax expenses that Inter IKEA systems reported was €590 million of “other operating charges.” IKEA has refused to explain these charges, but Inter IKEA Systems appears to make large payments to I.I. Holding, another Luxembourg-registered group that, according to The Economist, “is almost certain to be controlled by the Kamprad family.” I.I. Holding made a profit of €328 million in 2004.

In 2004, the Inter IKEA group of companies and I.I. Holding reported combined profits of €553m and paid €19m in taxes, or approximately 3.5 percent.[22]

The Berne Declaration, a non-profit organization in Switzerland that promotes corporate responsibility, has formally criticized IKEA for its tax avoidance strategies. In 2007, the Berne Declaration nominated IKEA for one of its Public Eye “awards,” which highlight corporate irresponsibility and are announced during the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland...

in Wikipedia

Ubuntu

Conceito africano que significa:

Human generosity, interconnectedness, community, bringing people together to work together on issues of common interest, toward a higher good. People, objects and events are all connected.
Everything is in an ongoing state of relatedness. Dynamics of cooperation support system. The interconnected web holds and honors all equally. Everything affects everything else. If I shortchange you, I shortchange myself.

(citação de um post de email mas desenvolvido aqui)

Enfim, teoria dos sistemas...

muito bem dito

... Num país de gente normal, os avisos de "perigo" deveriam bastar para que qualquer pessoa se afastasse com segurança da sombra das falésias (sendo que é de facto muito difícil estimar o grau de iminência de perigo nestes casos). Pessoas responsáveis não diriam (como disse numa entrevista um veraneante encostado à sombra de uma falésia sinalizada como perigosa, já após o acidente da Praia Maria Luisa) que a culpa era do Estado, que não o impedia fisicamente de se sentar na sombra tentadora das falésias, no areal junto ao mar.

Mana Lisa

Uma das recentes aquisições do MOBA

community

Excerto de entrevista
com ajuda do Wordle

crise

Intervenção do Primeiro-Ministro no debate sobre o Estado da Nação em 2009-07-02
parte "Responder à crise"
a partir do Wordle

posse

Ainda o Bernardo Soares, mas desta vez com o Wordle

Cheat Neutral

What is Cheat Offsetting?

When you cheat on your partner you add to the heartbreak, pain and jealousy in the atmosphere.

Cheatneutral offsets your cheating by funding someone else to be faithful and NOT cheat. This neutralises the pain and unhappy emotion and leaves you with a clear conscience.
Can I offset all my cheating?

First you should look at ways of reducing your cheating. Once you've done this you can use Cheatneutral to offset the remaining, unavoidable cheating

o paradoxo do amor

Nós não podemos amar, filho. O amor é a mais carnal das ilusões. Amar é possuir, escuta. E o que possui quem ama? O corpo? Para o possuir seria preciso tornar nossa a sua matéria, comê-lo, incluí-lo em nós... E essa impossibilidade seria temporária, porque o nosso próprio corpo passa e se transforma, porque nós não possuímos o nosso corpo (possuímos apenas a nossa sensação dele), e porque, uma vez possuído esse corpo amado, tornar-se-ia nosso, dei­xaria de ser outro, e o amor, por isso, com o desaparecimento do outro ente, desapareceria...

Possuímos a alma? — ouve-me em silêncio — Nós não a possuímos. Nem a nossa alma é nossa sequer. Como, de resto, possuir uma alma? Entre alma e alma há o abismo de serem almas.

Que possuímos? Que possuímos? Que nos leva a amar? A beleza? E nós possuímo-la amando? A mais feroz e dominadora posse de um corpo o que possui dele? Nem o corpo, nem a alma, nem a beleza sequer. A posse de um corpo lindo não abraça a beleza, abraça a carne celulada e gordurosa; o beijo não toca na beleza da boca, mas na carne húmida dos lábios perecíveis em mucosas; a própria cópula é um contacto apenas, um contacto esfregado e próximo, mas não uma penetração real, sequer, de um corpo por outro corpo... que possuímos nós? Que possuímos?

As nossas sensações, ao menos? Ao menos o amor é um meio de nos possuirmos, a nós, nas nossas sensações? e, ao menos, um modo de sonharmos nitidamente, e mais gloriosamente portanto, o sonho de existirmos? e, ao menos, desaparecida a sensação, fica a memória dela connosco sempre, e assim, realmente possuímos...

Desenganemos até disto. Nós nem as nossas sensações possuímos. Não fales. A memória, afinal, é a sensação do passado... E toda a sensação é uma ilusão...

— Escuta-me, escuta-me sempre. Escuta-me e não olhes pela janela aberta a plana outra margem do rio, nem o crepúsculo (...), nem esse silvo de um comboio que corta o longe vago (...) — Escuta-me em silêncio...

Nós não possuímos as nossas sensações... Nós não nos possuímos nelas.

in Bernardo Soares, Livro do Desassossego

autopoiese

Nunca amamos alguém. Amamos, tão-somente, a ideia que fazemos de alguém. É a um conceito nosso - em suma, é a nós mesmos - que amamos.

Isto é verdade em toda a escala do amor. No amor sexual buscamos um prazer nosso por intermédio de um corpo estranho. No amor diferente do sexual, buscamos um prazer nosso dado por intermédio de uma ideia nossa. O onanista é objecto, mas, em exacta verdade, o onanista é a perfeita expressão lógica do amoroso. É o único que não disfarça nem se engana.

As relações entre uma alma e outra, através de coisas tão incertas e divergentes como as palavras comuns e os gestos que se empreendem, são matéria de estranha complexidade. No próprio ato em que nos conhecemos, nos desconhecemos. Dizem os dois «amo-te» ou pensam-no e sentem-no por troca, e cada um quer dizer uma ideia diferente, uma vida diferente, até, porventura, uma cor ou um aroma diferente, na soma abstracta de impressões que constitui a actividade da alma.

in Bernardo Soares, O Livro do Desassossego.

sem nada

Sempre geniais

Congress Deadlocked Over How To Not Provide Health Care

WASHINGTON—After months of committee meetings and hundreds of hours of heated debate, the United States Congress remained deadlocked this week over the best possible way to deny Americans health care.

"Both parties understand that the current system is broken," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters Monday. "But what we can't seem to agree upon is how to best keep it broken, while still ensuring that no elected official takes any political risk whatsoever. It’s a very complicated issue."

"Ultimately, though, it's our responsibility as lawmakers to put these differences aside and focus on refusing Americans the health care they deserve," Pelosi added.

The legislative stalemate largely stems from competing ideologies deeply rooted along party lines. Democrats want to create a government-run system for not providing health care, while Republicans say coverage is best denied by allowing private insurers to make it unaffordable for as many citizens as possible.

"We have over 40 million people without insurance in this country today, and that is unacceptable," Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) said. "If we would just quit squabbling so much, we could get that number up to 50 or even 100 million. Why, there's no reason we can't work together to deny health care to everyone but the richest 1 percent of the population."

"That's what America is all about," he added...

OMG!!!

Esta é a campanha dos Conservadores, extrema direita e sabe-se lá mais quem contra a proposta do sistema de saúde nos EUA. Nem é preciso ir ao Dennys.

The Waves

What should I do with you, waves, you who can never decide
whether you’re the first or the last?
You think you can define the coast with your constant wish-wash,
grind it down with your coming and going.
And yet no one knows how long the coastline really is,
where land stops, where land begins, and you’re forever changing
the line, length, lay, with the moon and unpredictable.

Consistent alone is your inconsistency.

Ultimately victorious since, as so often evoked, this wears away
the stones, grinds the sand down as fine as needed for
hourglasses and egg-timers, as required for calibrating time,
for telling the difference between hard and soft.

Victorious also because, never tiring, you win the contest who of us
will be the first to fall asleep, or you, being the ocean still,
because you never sleep.

Although colourless yourself, you seem blue
when the sky is gently mirrored on your surface, the ideal course
for being strolled upon by the carpenter’s son, the most changeable element.

And inversely, when you are wild and loud and your breakers thunder,
I listen between the peaks of your rollers, and from the highest waves,
from breaking spume, a thousand voices break away, mine,
yesterday’s ones that I didn’t know, that otherwise just whisper,
and all the others too, and in their midst the Nazarene.
Over and over again those stupendous five final words:
Why have you left me?

I hold my own, shout at each single wave:
Are you staying?
Are you staying?
Are you staying, or what?

Die Wellen (The Waves) , Einsturzende Neubauten

Mankind is no Island

Alentejo

outro tempo e espaço

praia da Zambujeira

no monte é que eu estou bem


formação

fora do mapa

terra seca

vale de Odesseixe

praia do carvalhal

por mim pode ficar tudo como está

havia um pessegueiro na ilha

sair da paisagem

comida

a beleza industrial de S.Torpes